jason carr Lesson Plan Teaching Tudor-Stuart History: Historical Voyeurism GOAL: Encourage students to examine primary epistolary sources, when available to them. WHAT: Read, discuss, and evaluate the usefulness of the letters of Mary Stuart and Elizabeth Tudor as evidentiary historical sources. The personal nature of the documents may especially appeal to the students, and increase their willingness to think critically about history. "A man who cannot seduce men cannot save them either." Kierkegaard, Journals. PURPOSE: Demonstrate that: " "the past" is not identical to "history" (the map is not the territory). " Historians write history using sources as evidence " Students can generate sources for later historians " Students can write histories WHAT YOU NEED: 1. Lewis, Jayne Elizabeth. The Trial of Mary Queen of Scots: A Brief History with Documents. ISBN: 0312154399. (for text versions of the letters) 2. Photostat copies of the actual letters 3. Writing paper, pens/pencils WHAT YOU DO: Activity A: Review the synopsis of the trial and related events (lecture) Activity B: Read the texts of the letters, pp. 78-90. Activity C: Break up into groups of 4-5 and: 1. Discuss the actual manuscripts, and if the physical appearance tells us anything 2. At what points in the letters does the woman come out? The cousin? The queen? The Protestant or Catholic? 3. Does each writer maintain a consistent tone, or are there shifts? If so, where did they occur, and why? 4. What can we tell about the emotional or mental context for the letters? 5. How might the letters have been different if absolute privacy could be achieved? 6. How might any difference affect the usefulness of the letters to later historians? 7. Do the differences make the letters any less "true"? Activity D: 1. Dissolve the groups 2. Gedenke: when you write in a journal or diary do you ever hold back because you suspect that someone might read it? How does this change what you write? How might this affect how someone understands you 100 years from now? 3. You will write a series of short letters (a paragraph or two each): two from Mary to Elizabeth and two from Elizabeth to Mary. One set will assume absolute privacy and one will assume public scrutiny. Use modern language (you are not required to use Elizabethan style), and address it to the recipient and sign it from you as the monarch you are. Notice the signatures in the manuscripts! Put your name on the back of each page. 4. Discuss this experience in class. What was it like? Post the work around the room (remember the names are on the back, so students shouldn't be embarrassed). Activity E: 1. Write a page or so, describing the relationship between Mary and Elizabeth at this point. Ground your description as much as possible in what you see in the letters. 2. Read several aloud, unattributed. Note class reaction and probable disagreement and disbelief. 3. Instructor: discuss these descriptions as history based on primary sources, and have points of view, biases, and unconscious agendas. 4. Encourage students to think of history as being written by a person, for a reason, for an audience. Activity F: 5. Later in the week, invite the students to write their names (or pseudonyms) on the letters they wrote. Note that some will not do it, some will, some will accidentally or on purpose sign the wrong one. After a couple of days, discuss this as an aspect of the difficulty of attribution, forgery, and historical error. How will someone in 100 years be able to figure out who wrote what? Does it matter? Other materials: 1. Samples of R.E.'s signature http://www.handwriting.org/images/samples/qelizab1.htm 2. Hibbert, Christopher. The Virgin Queen : Elizabeth I, Genius of the Golden Age. ISBN: 0201608170 3. Jackson, Glenda, et al in "Elizabeth R", BBC video in six parts, notable for its treatment of the matter of Mary Queen of Scots.. ASIN: 630354231X http://www.mousetrap.net/~mouse/uta/transatlantic/